My Photo

July 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

McDonald's Proves Branding Works

Images1 As if we needed more proof that branding works...

A report in the New Scientist details a recent study revealing that pre-school kids prefer foods wrapped in McDonald's packaging over foods served in unwrapped packaging. Most parents are thinking, no duh. From the report:

"Dina Borzekowski at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Health in Baltimore, Maryland, US, and her colleagues asked 63 preschoolers, aged three to five, to sample two meals, each consisting of a chicken nugget, a quarter of a hamburger, french fries, two baby carrots and a small cup of milk.

Although both meals came from a local McDonald's, only one of them appeared in its original packaging. Researchers presented items from the other meal in plain wrappers, which lacked the company's distinctive logo.

In most cases children said they tasted a difference between the two meals, and they overwhelmingly preferred the McDonalds-branded foods."

Images2 Interesting. Kids preferred McDonald's branded carrots by a margin of 2 to 1. Same carrots. Different packaging. They preferred the french fries 73% to 13%. All because of the golden arches. It's not like we don't know that branding/marketing/advertising works. After all, we spend well over $10 billion a year marketing products to kids. And billions more to advertise to adults. But it is somewhat disturbing to see the affects on kids as young as three.

Of course McDonald's has known this for more than 10 years—watch the proof here.

Might be time to unplug the television.

AdFreak has also written about this.

The Brand Story "SuperBowl Ad Wrap Up" Wrap Up

Images_6 It's been a few days since the SuperBowl and just about everyone has an opinion (mostly the same one) about how mediocre the ads in this year's SuperBowl were. Rather than write them out (or even add my own thoughts), here's a short list of links to what others have said better than I:

You can see all the ads at iFilm. Jon Stewart tries his hand at an ad here. Maybe consumer generated ads do have a future. It's certainly better than the ad Sales Genie spent their $2.4 million on.

Start your review of the reviews with the podcast from the guys at American Copywriter. Then check out what John Moore at Brand Autopsy has to say.

Here's the Ad Meter from USA Today.

Advertising Age's resident curmudgeon, Bob Garfield, wrote: "Still my beaten heart, but this may have been the most brand-relevant Super Bowl of advertising ever played."  Read it here. Not to be outdone, BrandWeek's Barbara Lippert adds her thoughts here.

Kellogg School of Management's MBA students have this to say about the ads. Click here for AdLand's takes, here for AdFreak. AdPulp's coverage starts here.

Seth Godin adds his thoughts here. I don't always agree with Seth, but he's right on when he says the advertising at the SuperBowl isn't about selling.

Gizmodo's review is here. TV Squad's thoughts are here. Tim Sanders likes the Coke Ad. If you've read Love is the Killer Ap, you'll understand why.

And probably the most ridiculous thing written about the ads is from the New York Times: "...the ongoing war [in Iraq] seemed to linger just below the surface of many of this year’s commercials." Come on. Read the rest of this silly analysis here.

If you've checked out all the links above and still have the need for more, check the 2.5 million pages dedicated to the subject, here.

LogoWorkers

  • Design Matters
    A Blog about small business design at the Duct Tape Marketing blog channel by one of my talented coworkers.
  • Kirby Fine Arts
    Rob Kirby is just one of the talented designers working at LogoWorks. See his work here.
  • Manizesto
    Small business marketing thoughts from Jonathan Munk an important player on the Logoworks marketing team.
Blog powered by TypePad